Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2011Z17951

Defensie in Griekenland

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

19 September 2011

Last action

10 October 2011 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Ewout Irrgang, Harry van Bommel

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

19 February 2024

Defence

Summary

Defensie in Griekenland

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 September 2011

    Written questions

    Defensie in Griekenland

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 10 October 2011

    Answer

    Antwoord vragen Irrgang en Van Bommel over defensie-uitgaven door Griekenland

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v3 · 18 October 2011
  • 2011D49198 · 10 October 2011
  • 2011D49198 · 10 October 2011
  • v2 · 20 September 2011
  • 2011D44646 · 18 September 2011

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord vragen Irrgang en Van Bommel over defensie-uitgaven door Griekenland

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord vragen Irrgang en Van Bommel over defensie-uitgaven door Griekenland

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 10 October 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Defensie in Griekenland

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 18 September 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.