Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2012Z00094

De kapotte sluis bij Eefde

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

6 January 2012

Last action

18 January 2012 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Sander de Rouwe, Pieter Omtzigt

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

De kapotte sluis bij Eefde

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 5 January 2012

    Written questions

    De kapotte sluis bij Eefde

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 18 January 2012

    Answer

    Antwoord vragen Omtzigt en De Rouwe over het incident met de sluis bij Eefde

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v3 · 30 January 2012
  • 2012D00992 · 18 January 2012
  • 2012D00992 · 18 January 2012
  • v2 · 10 January 2012
  • 2012D00239 · 5 January 2012

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord vragen Omtzigt en De Rouwe over het incident met de sluis bij Eefde

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord vragen Omtzigt en De Rouwe over het incident met de sluis bij Eefde

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 18 January 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • De kapotte sluis bij Eefde

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 5 January 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.