Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2012Z03207

Bouwfraude bij Rotterdamse scholen

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

20 February 2012

Last action

19 March 2012 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Jasper van Dijk

Subjects

Education

Source updated

19 February 2024

Education

Summary

Bouwfraude bij Rotterdamse scholen

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 19 February 2012

    Written questions

    Bouwfraude bij Rotterdamse scholen

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 19 March 2012

    Answer

    Antwoord vragen Jasper van Dijk over bouwfraude bij Rotterdamse scholen

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v3 · 22 March 2012
  • 2012D11989 · 19 March 2012
  • 2012D11989 · 19 March 2012
  • v2 · 22 February 2012
  • 2012D07056 · 19 February 2012

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord vragen Jasper van Dijk over bouwfraude bij Rotterdamse scholen

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord vragen Jasper van Dijk over bouwfraude bij Rotterdamse scholen

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 19 March 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Bouwfraude bij Rotterdamse scholen

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 19 February 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.