Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2012Z07292

De radiospotjes van subsidieslurper Oxfam Novib

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

6 April 2012

Last action

18 April 2012 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Johan Driessen

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

De radiospotjes van subsidieslurper Oxfam Novib

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 5 April 2012

    Written questions

    De radiospotjes van subsidieslurper Oxfam Novib

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 18 April 2012

    Answer

    Antwoord vragen Driessen over radiospotjes van Oxfam Novib

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v3 · 24 April 2012
  • 2012D17300 · 18 April 2012
  • 2012D17300 · 18 April 2012
  • v2 · 11 April 2012
  • 2012D15507 · 5 April 2012

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord vragen Driessen over radiospotjes van Oxfam Novib

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord vragen Driessen over radiospotjes van Oxfam Novib

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 18 April 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • De radiospotjes van subsidieslurper Oxfam Novib

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 5 April 2012

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.