PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2013Z01465

COSAC's report “Seventeenth Bi-annual Report: Developments in European Union Procedures and Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny”

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

28 January 2013

Last action

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

COSAC's report “Seventeenth Bi-annual Report: Developments in European Union Procedures and Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny”

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

3 official files

Antwoord op vragen van de leden Omtzigt, Pechtold, Van Bommel, Madlener, Van der Staaij, Ouwehand en Segers over het rapport “Seventeenth Bi-annual Report: Developments in European Union Procedures en Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny” van de COSAC

View fileDownload file

  • Antwoord op vragen van de leden Omtzigt, Pechtold, Van Bommel, Madlener, Van der Staaij, Ouwehand en Segers over het rapport “Seventeenth Bi-annual Report: Developments in European Union Procedures en Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny” van de COSAC

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 14 February 2013

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Corrigendum beantwoording Kamervragen Omtzigt e.a. over toegang tot interne EU-Raadsdocumenten

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen (nader) · NL · 7 February 2013

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Het rapport “Seventeenth Bi-annual Report: Developments in European Union Procedures en Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny” van COSAC

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 27 January 2013

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.