Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2015Z08837

Thuiszittende, autistische kinderen

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

19 May 2015

Last action

9 June 2015 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Tjitske Siderius

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Thuiszittende, autistische kinderen

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 May 2015

    Written questions

    Thuiszittende, autistische kinderen

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 9 June 2015

    Answer

    Antwoord op vragen van het lid Siderius over thuiszittende, autistische kinderen

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v3 · 12 June 2015
  • 2015D21683 · 9 June 2015
  • 2015D21683 · 9 June 2015
  • v2 · 20 May 2015
  • 2015D18070 · 18 May 2015

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord op vragen van het lid Siderius over thuiszittende, autistische kinderen

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord op vragen van het lid Siderius over thuiszittende, autistische kinderen

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 9 June 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Thuiszittende, autistische kinderen

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 18 May 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.