Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2015Z13715

Illegale vogelvangst in Nederland

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

6 July 2015

Last action

23 August 2015 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Marianne Thieme

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Illegale vogelvangst in Nederland

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 5 July 2015

    Written questions

    Illegale vogelvangst in Nederland

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 23 August 2015

    Answer

    Antwoord op vragen van het lid Thieme over illegale vogelvangst in Nederland

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v3 · 25 August 2015
  • 2015D30199 · 23 August 2015
  • 2015D30199 · 23 August 2015
  • v2 · 8 July 2015
  • 2015D27501 · 5 July 2015

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord op vragen van het lid Thieme over illegale vogelvangst in Nederland

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord op vragen van het lid Thieme over illegale vogelvangst in Nederland

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 23 August 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Illegale vogelvangst in Nederland

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 5 July 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.