Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2015Z20980

Hondsdolheid onder vossen

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

9 November 2015

Last action

21 December 2015 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Marianne Thieme

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Hondsdolheid onder vossen

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 8 November 2015

    Written questions

    Hondsdolheid onder vossen

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 21 December 2015

    Answer

    Antwoord op de vragen van het lid Thieme over hondsdolheid bij vossen

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v3 · 23 December 2015
  • 2015D50715 · 21 December 2015
  • 2015D50715 · 21 December 2015
  • v2 · 10 November 2015
  • 2015D42764 · 8 November 2015

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord op de vragen van het lid Thieme over hondsdolheid bij vossen

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord op de vragen van het lid Thieme over hondsdolheid bij vossen

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 21 December 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Hondsdolheid onder vossen

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 8 November 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.