Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2016Z01974

De handhaving van cao’s

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

1 February 2016

Last action

22 March 2016 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Keklik Yücel, Lutz Jacobi

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

De handhaving van cao’s

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 31 January 2016

    Written questions

    De handhaving van cao’s

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 22 March 2016

    Answer

    Antwoord op vragen van de leden Yücel en Jacobi over de handhaving van cao’s

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v3 · 25 March 2016
  • 2016D12132 · 22 March 2016
  • 2016D12132 · 22 March 2016
  • v2 · 2 February 2016
  • 2016D04235 · 31 January 2016

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord op vragen van de leden Yücel en Jacobi over de handhaving van cao’s

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord op vragen van de leden Yücel en Jacobi over de handhaving van cao’s

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 22 March 2016

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • De handhaving van cao’s

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 31 January 2016

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.