Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2019Z15800

Het falend munitiebeleid

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

19 August 2019

Last action

10 September 2019 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Gabriëlle Popken

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Het falend munitiebeleid

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 August 2019

    Written questions

    Het falend munitiebeleid

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 10 September 2019

    Answer

    Antwoord op vragen van het lid Popken over het falend munitiebeleid

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • ah-tk-20182019-3937 · 13 September 2019
  • 2019D34544 · 10 September 2019
  • 2019D34544 · 10 September 2019
  • kv-tk-2019Z15800 · 20 August 2019
  • 2019D32736 · 18 August 2019

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord op vragen van het lid Popken over het falend munitiebeleid

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord op vragen van het lid Popken over het falend munitiebeleid

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 10 September 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Het falend munitiebeleid

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 18 August 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.