Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Question · Schriftelijke vragen

2020Z14273

De noodremprocedure

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

23 July 2020

Last action

18 August 2020 · Answer

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Pieter Omtzigt, Evert Jan Slootweg

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

De noodremprocedure

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 22 July 2020

    Written questions

    De noodremprocedure

    Source: Schriftelijke vragen

  2. 18 August 2020

    Answer

    Antwoord op vragen van de leden Omtzigt en Slootweg over de noodremprocedure

    Source: Antwoord schriftelijke vragen

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • ah-tk-20192020-3809 · 3 September 2020
  • 2020D31904 · 18 August 2020
  • 2020D31904 · 18 August 2020
  • kv-tk-2020Z14273 · 27 July 2020
  • 2020D30395 · 22 July 2020

Documents

2 official files

Antwoord op vragen van de leden Omtzigt en Slootweg over de noodremprocedure

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Antwoord op vragen van de leden Omtzigt en Slootweg over de noodremprocedure

    Antwoord schriftelijke vragen · NL · 18 August 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • De noodremprocedure

    Schriftelijke vragen · NL · 22 July 2020

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.