PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Record · Brief Kamer

2011Z14520

Letter from the RU committee in response to the proposal to the House to bring focus to the accountability debate on the 2011 budget year (debate in May 2012) and to focus on 4 topics, namely: safety, accessibility (traffic jam problems), nature policy and sustainability (climate and environment)

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

29 June 2011

Last action

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Letter from the RU committee in response to the proposal to the House to bring focus to the accountability debate on the 2011 budget year (debate in May 2012) and to focus on 4 topics, namely: safety, accessibility (traffic jam problems), nature policy and sustainability (climate and environment)

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Brief van de commissie Rijksuitgaven t.g.v. het voorstel aan de Kamer om focus aan te brengen in het verantwoordingsdebat over het begrotingsjaar 2011 (debat mei 2012) en daarvoor 4 onderwerpen centraal te stellen, t.w. veiligheid, bereikbaarheid (fileproblematiek), natuurbeleid en duurzaamheid (klimaat en milieu)

View fileDownload file

  • Brief van de commissie Rijksuitgaven t.g.v. het voorstel aan de Kamer om focus aan te brengen in het verantwoordingsdebat over het begrotingsjaar 2011 (debat mei 2012) en daarvoor 4 onderwerpen centraal te stellen, t.w. veiligheid, bereikbaarheid (fileproblematiek), natuurbeleid en duurzaamheid (klimaat en milieu)

    Brief commissie · NL · 27 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.