PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Record · Brief van lid/fractie/commissie

2015Z03659

Request for response from Minister BuHA-OS to Volkskrant article "Special Court must take the sting out of trade agreement"

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

2 March 2015

Last action

1 March 2015 · Introduced

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Bram van Ojik, Jasper van Dijk

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Request for response from Minister BuHA-OS to Volkskrant article "Special Court must take the sting out of trade agreement"

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 1 March 2015

    Letter

    Request for response from Minister BuHA-OS to Volkskrant article "Special Court must take the sting out of trade agreement"

    Source: Brief lid / fractie

  2. 1 March 2015

    Letter

    Aan min BuHa-OS Verzoek om response to artikel Volkskrant "Speciaal Hof moet angel halen uit handelsverdrag"

    Source: Brief commissie aan bewindspersoon

  3. 1 March 2015

    Introduced

    Request for response from Minister BuHA-OS to Volkskrant article "Special Court must take the sting out of trade agreement"

    Source: Brief van lid/fractie/commissie

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v2 · 2 March 2015
  • v1 · 2 March 2015

Documents

2 official files

Aan min BuHa-OS Verzoek om reactie op artikel Volkskrant "Speciaal Hof moet angel halen uit handelsverdrag"

View fileDownload file

  • Verzoek om reactie minister BuHA-OS op artikel Volkskrant "Speciaal Hof moet angel halen uit handelsverdrag"

    Brief lid / fractie · NL · 1 March 2015

    DownloadOpen at official source

  • Aan min BuHa-OS Verzoek om reactie op artikel Volkskrant "Speciaal Hof moet angel halen uit handelsverdrag"

    Brief commissie aan bewindspersoon · NL · 1 March 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.