PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Record · Position paper

2015Z18179

Comments from the Municipality of Zutphen regarding the hearing/round table discussion on the Judiciary Location Policy dated October 8, 2015

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

5 October 2015

Last action

14 October 2015 · [Vrij tekstveld / geen Parlisproces]

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Comments from the Municipality of Zutphen regarding the hearing/round table discussion on the Judiciary Location Policy dated October 8, 2015

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 30 September 2015

    Position paper

    Comments from the Municipality of Zutphen regarding the hearing/round table discussion on the Judiciary Location Policy dated October 8, 2015

    Source: Position paper

  2. 4 October 2015

    Introduced

    Comments from the Municipality of Zutphen regarding the hearing/round table discussion on the Judiciary Location Policy dated October 8, 2015

    Source: Position paper

  3. 8 October 2015

    Rondetafelgesprek

    Locatiebeleid Rechtspraak

    Source: Rondetafelgesprek

  4. 14 October 2015

    [Vrij tekstveld / geen Parlisproces]

    Betrokken bij het rondetafelgesprek on the locatiebeleid van de rechtspraak op 8 oktober 2015.

    Source: [Vrij tekstveld / geen Parlisproces]

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v1 · 5 October 2015

Documents

1 official file

Commentaar Gemeente Zutphen t.b.v. hoorzitting/rondetafelgesprek Locatiebeleid Rechtspraak d.d. 8 oktober 2015

View fileDownload file

  • Commentaar Gemeente Zutphen t.b.v. hoorzitting/rondetafelgesprek Locatiebeleid Rechtspraak d.d. 8 oktober 2015

    Position paper · NL · 30 September 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

  • vaste commissie voor Veiligheid en Justitie (2010-2017) · VJ · Voortouwcommissie

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.