PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Record · Position paper

2015Z21257

Position paper T. Schaafsma for the hearing/round table discussion on Debt Counseling and Guardianship dated December 3, 2015

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

11 November 2015

Last action

3 December 2015 · Rondetafelgesprek

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Position paper T. Schaafsma for the hearing/round table discussion on Debt Counseling and Guardianship dated December 3, 2015

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 10 November 2015

    Position paper

    Position paper T. Schaafsma for the hearing/round table discussion on Debt Counseling and Guardianship dated December 3, 2015

    Source: Position paper

  2. 10 November 2015

    Introduced

    Position paper T. Schaafsma for the hearing/round table discussion on Debt Counseling and Guardianship dated December 3, 2015

    Source: Position paper

  3. 18 November 2015

    [Vrij tekstveld / geen Parlisproces]

    Betrekken bij het rondetafelgesprek over schuldhulpverlening en bewindvoering op 3 december 2015.

    Source: [Vrij tekstveld / geen Parlisproces]

  4. 3 December 2015

    Rondetafelgesprek

    Schuldhulpverlening en bewindvoering

    Source: Rondetafelgesprek

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v1 · 11 November 2015

Documents

1 official file

Position paper T. Schaafsma t.b.v. hoorzitting/rondetafelgesprek Schuldhulpverlening en bewindvoering d.d. 3 december 2015

View fileDownload file

  • Position paper T. Schaafsma t.b.v. hoorzitting/rondetafelgesprek Schuldhulpverlening en bewindvoering d.d. 3 december 2015

    Position paper · NL · 10 November 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

  • vaste commissie voor Veiligheid en Justitie (2010-2017) · VJ · Voortouwcommissie

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.