Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Record · Rondvraagpunt procedurevergadering

2015Z24184

Request from members Van Gerven and Van Dekken to request a response from the State Secretary for Economic Affairs on an article by "Fur for Animals" about the (non)compliance with the obligation for textile manufacturers to report whether their products contain real fur.

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

10 December 2015

Last action

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Request from members Van Gerven and Van Dekken to request a response from the State Secretary for Economic Affairs on an article by "Fur for Animals" about the (non)compliance with the obligation for textile manufacturers to report whether their products contain real fur.

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

aan staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken reactie op artikel "Bont voor Dieren" inzake melding of producten echt bont bevatten

View fileDownload file

  • Aan staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken response to artikel "Bont voor Dieren" regarding melding of producten echt bont bevatten

    Brief commissie aan bewindspersoon · NL · 16 December 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Verzoek van de leden Van Gerven en Dekker om een reactie te vragen aan de staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken op een artikel van "Bont voor Dieren" on the (niet) nakomen van de verplichting voor textielfabrikanten om te melden of hun producten echt bont bevatten.

    Brief lid / fractie · NL · 9 December 2015

    DownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.