PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Record · Position paper

2016Z22094

Position paper BVB for hearing/round table discussion Pricing and Market Inland Shipping dated November 30, 2016

concludedNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

24 November 2016

Last action

7 December 2016 · [Vrij tekstveld / geen Parlisproces]

Status

Afgedaan

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 February 2024

Summary

Position paper BVB for hearing/round table discussion Pricing and Market Inland Shipping dated November 30, 2016

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 22 November 2016

    Position paper

    Position paper BVB for hearing/round table discussion Pricing and Market Inland Shipping dated November 30, 2016

    Source: Position paper

  2. 23 November 2016

    Introduced

    Position paper BVB for hearing/round table discussion Pricing and Market Inland Shipping dated November 30, 2016

    Source: Position paper

  3. 30 November 2016

    Behandelen [en afdoen]

    Behandeld.

    Source: Behandelen [en afdoen]

  4. 7 December 2016

    [Vrij tekstveld / geen Parlisproces]

    Reeds geagendeerd voor het rondetafelgesprek Beprijzing en Markt Binnenvaart d.d. 30 november 2016

    Source: [Vrij tekstveld / geen Parlisproces]

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v2 · 25 November 2016
  • 2016D45332 · 22 November 2016

Documents

1 official file

Position paper BVB t.b.v. hoorzitting/rondetafelgesprek Beprijzing en Markt Binnenvaart d.d. 30 november 2016

Download file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

  • Position paper BVB t.b.v. hoorzitting/rondetafelgesprek Beprijzing en Markt Binnenvaart d.d. 30 november 2016

    Position paper · NL · 22 November 2016

    DownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

  • vaste commissie voor Infrastructuur en Milieu (2010-2017) · IM · Voortouwcommissie

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.