Response to the amendment by members Bushoff and Ellemeet about ensuring that donor children are informed about a genetic condition if the Board does not have the contact details of the donor child itself (Parliamentary document 35870-26) and the amended motion by member Ellemeet et al. about investigating how the maximum number of families can also apply to donors who work outside the clinic and how violations can be punished (t.v. Parliamentary document 35870-24)

Summary

Response to the amendment by members Bushoff and Ellemeet about ensuring that donor children are informed about a genetic condition if the Board does not have the contact details of the donor child itself (Parliamentary document 35870-26) and the amended motion by member Ellemeet et al. about investigating how the maximum number of families can also apply to donors who work outside the clinic and how violations can be punished (t.v. Parliamentary document 35870-24)

Machine translation from Dutch. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Reactie op het amendement van van de leden Bushoff en Ellemeet over zeker stellen dat donorkinderen geïnformeerd worden over een genetische aandoening als het College niet beschikt over de contactgegevens van het donorkind zelf (Kamerstuk 35870-26) en de gewijzigde motie van het lid Ellemeet c.s. over onderzoeken hoe het maximumaantal gezinnen ook van toepassing kan zijn op donoren die buiten de kliniek werken en hoe overtreding bestraft kan worden (t.v.v. Kamerstuk 35870-24)

  Brief regering · NL · 8 May 2023

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.