Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Netherlands · Record · Brief regering

2026Z17125

Stand van zaken van het project Defensie Operationeel Kleding Systeem (DOKS)

openNetherlands· House of Representatives· NL

Introduced

21 August 2026

Last action

28 September 2026 · Behandelen [en afdoen]

Status

Lopend

Sponsors

Derk Boswijk

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

29 September 2026

Defence

Summary

Stand van zaken van het project Defensie Operationeel Kleding Systeem (DOKS)

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 20 August 2026

    Letter

    Stand van zaken van het project Defensie Operationeel Kleding Systeem (DOKS)

    Source: Brief regering

  2. 21 August 2026

    Introduced

    Stand van zaken van het project Defensie Operationeel Kleding Systeem (DOKS)

    Source: Brief regering

  3. 1 September 2026

    LVIS - rondgezonden en gepubliceerd

    Rondgezonden en gepubliceerd.

    Source: LVIS - rondgezonden en gepubliceerd

  4. 10 September 2026

    Agenderen - wetgevingsoverleg

    Agenderen voor wetgevingsoverleg Personeel d.d. 28 september 2026.

    Source: Agenderen - wetgevingsoverleg

  5. 28 September 2026

    Behandelen [en afdoen]

    Behandeld.

    Source: Behandelen [en afdoen]

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

  • v2 · 3 September 2026
  • v1 · 21 August 2026

Documents

1 official file

Stand van zaken van het project Defensie Operationeel Kleding Systeem (DOKS)

Download file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

  • vaste commissie voor Defensie · DEF · Voortouwcommissie
  • Derk Boswijk · Indiener

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.