Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,151 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 6,057Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 295Austria · 222United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0195_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#LB v Smetna palata na Republika Bulgaria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Applicability to a purely internal situation – Article 58(1) and (4) – Selection criteria – Technical and professional ability of the tenderers – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Article 8(3) – Control measures – Possibility for national authorities protecting the financial interests of the European Union to assess differently a public procurement procedure.#Case C-195/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0195decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#LB v Smetna palata na Republika Bulgaria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Applicability to a purely internal situation – Article 58(1) and (4) – Selection criteria – Technical and professional ability of the tenderers – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Article 8(3) – Control measures – Possibility for national authorities protecting the financial interests of the European Union to assess differently a public procurement procedure.#Case C-195/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0743_INFdecided

Order of the Court (chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#Marina Yachting Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-743/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0761_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-761/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0761decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-761/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0762_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-762/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0305_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Article 45a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Certification procedure – 2017 promotion exercise – Exclusion from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Notice of competition – Obligation to include a list of annexes with the application form – Non-compliance – Rejection of the application – Principle of sound administration – Proportionality – Regulation No 1 – Rules on languages.#Case C-305/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0744_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#Henry Cotton's Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-744/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0762decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-762/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0744decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#Henry Cotton's Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-744/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0305decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Article 45a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Certification procedure – 2017 promotion exercise – Exclusion from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Notice of competition – Obligation to include a list of annexes with the application form – Non-compliance – Rejection of the application – Principle of sound administration – Proportionality – Regulation No 1 – Rules on languages.#Case C-305/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0743decided

Order of the Court (chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#Marina Yachting Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-743/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0168decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 31 March 2022.#KL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 2(4) – Condition of double criminality of the act – Article 4(1) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Verification by the executing judicial authority – Acts some of which constitute an offence under the law of the executing Member State – Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of proportionality of criminal offences and penalties.#Case C-168/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0264_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Établissement Amra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU three-dimensional mark – Shape of a rebound shoe – Absolute ground for refusal – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Presence of word elements – Lack of essential non-functional characteristics.#Case T-264/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0291_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-291/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0445_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Copal Tree Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark COPALLI – Earlier national word mark COMPAL – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark.#Case T-445/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0292_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-292/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0291decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-291/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0125decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 March 2022.#RT France v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Suspension of the broadcasting activities of certain media – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency – Weighing of competing interests.#Case T-125/22 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0445decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Copal Tree Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark COPALLI – Earlier national word mark COMPAL – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark.#Case T-445/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0030decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SO COUTURE – EU word mark SO…? – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-30/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0035decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#SFD S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION – Earlier EU word marks ALLMAX NUTRITION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-35/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0451decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Testa Rossa – Earlier EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-451/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0206decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Oliver Kalita and Christian Haas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing two animals – Earlier EU figurative mark representing an animal – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-206/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0264decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Établissement Amra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU three-dimensional mark – Shape of a rebound shoe – Absolute ground for refusal – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Presence of word elements – Lack of essential non-functional characteristics.#Case T-264/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0206_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Oliver Kalita and Christian Haas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing two animals – Earlier EU figurative mark representing an animal – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-206/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0125_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 March 2022.#RT France v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Suspension of the broadcasting activities of certain media – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency – Weighing of competing interests.#Case T-125/22 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0292decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-292/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0720decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Perry Street Software, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark SCRUFFS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-720/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0720_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Perry Street Software, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark SCRUFFS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-720/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0451_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Testa Rossa – Earlier EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-451/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0030_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SO COUTURE – EU word mark SO …? – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-30/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0035_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#SFD S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION – Earlier EU word marks ALLMAX NUTRITION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-35/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 March 2022

PreviousPage 23 of 24Next