Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

351 records in EU in 2019

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 493Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 88Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0582decided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 15 October 2019.#Boxer Barcelona, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark XBOXER BARCELONA — Earlier EU figurative mark representing the letter ‘x’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Evidence — Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Restriction of the application for registration before the Board of Appeal — Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0128decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2019.#Dumitru-Tudor Dorobantu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Grounds for refusal of execution — Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment — Conditions of detention in the issuing Member State — Assessment by the executing judicial authority — Criteria.#Case C-128/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0462open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Joint Committee and the Subcommittee on Trade and Investment established by the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Mongolia, of the other part as regards the adoption of decisions on the rules of procedure of the Joint Committee and the rules of procedure of the Subcommittee on Trade and Investment

European Union · European Commission · 14 October 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0480open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the relevant Committees of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe as regards the proposals for modifications to UN Regulations Nos. 0, 16, 17, 21, 29, 43, 44, 48, 53, 55, 58, 67, 74, 80, 83, 85, 86, 98, 107, 112, 113, 115, 116, 123, 129, 135, 148, 149 and 150, as regards the proposal for modifications to Global Technical Regulation (GTR) No. 2, as regards the proposal for amendments to Mutual Resolution MR.1, as regards the proposals for amendments to Consolidated Resolutions R.E.3 and R.E.5, and as regards the proposals for authorisations to develop an amendment to GTR No. 6 and to develop a new GTR on the Determination of Electrified Vehicle Power (DEVP)

European Union · European Commission · 11 October 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0459open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Committee on Services and Investment established under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part of the other part as regards the adoption of a code of conduct for Members of the Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal and mediators

European Union · European Commission · 11 October 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0458open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the CETA Joint Committee established under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part as regards the adoption of a decision on the procedure for the adoption of interpretations in accordance with Articles 8.31.3 and 8.44.3(a) of CETA as Annex to its Rules of Procedure

European Union · European Commission · 11 October 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0457open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the CETA Joint Committee established under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part as regards the adoption of a decision setting out the administrative and organisational matters regarding the functioning of the Appellate Tribunal

European Union · European Commission · 11 October 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1736in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/1736 of 10 October 2019 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Partnership Committee established by the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, as regards the establishment of the list of individuals to serve as arbitrators in dispute-settlement proceedings

European Union · EUR-Lex · 10 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0536_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 October 2019.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark FITNESS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court — Article 65(6) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal.#Case T-536/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0700_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 October 2019.#Kalypso Media Group GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DUNGEONS — Earlier EU word mark DUNGEONS & DRAGONS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-700/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0428_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 October 2019.#McDreams Hotel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark mc dreams hotels Träumen zum kleinen Preis! — Earlier EU word mark McDONALD’S — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Family of marks — Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark.#Case T-428/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0428decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 October 2019.#McDreams Hotel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark mc dreams hotels Träumen zum kleinen Preis! — Earlier EU word mark McDONALD’S — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Family of marks — Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark.#Case T-428/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0536decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 October 2019.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark FITNESS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court — Article 65(6) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal.#Case T-536/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0577decided

Order of the Court of 10 October 2019.#KID-Systeme GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Whether appeals may be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Court’s Rules of Procedure — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-577/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0577_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 10 October 2019.#KID-Systeme GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Whether appeals may be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Court’s Rules of Procedure — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-577/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 October 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0713_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 October 2019.#Esim Chemicals GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ESIM Chemicals — Earlier national word mark ESKIM — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed — Decision of the Board of Appeal declaring that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-713/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 October 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0713decided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 October 2019.#Esim Chemicals GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ESIM Chemicals — Earlier national word mark ESKIM — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed — Decision of the Board of Appeal declaring that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-713/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 October 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D2156in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/2156 of 7 October 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Association Council set up by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, as regards the adoption of a recommendation on the extension of the EU-Morocco Action Plan implementing the advanced status (2013-2017)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 7 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0589_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 7 October 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-589/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0588_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 7 October 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-588/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0587_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 October 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-587/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0590_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 7 October 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-590/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0589decided

Order of the Court of 7 October 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-589/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0587decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 October 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-587/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0588decided

Order of the Court of 7 October 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-588/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 October 2019

PreviousPage 7 of 8Next