Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United Kingdom · Motion · Early Day Motion

EDM 430

SURREY COMET 'LOLLIPOP' PATROL CAMPAIGN

openUnited Kingdom· UK Parliament· EN

Introduced

28 February 2000

Last action

28 February 2000 · Early Day Motion

Status

0

Sponsors

Ed Davey

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 February 2000

Summary

That this House congratulates the Surrey Comet on their succesful lollipop patrol campaign highlighting the fact that there is a chronic shortage of lollipop attendants throughout the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames; notes that this is likely to be reflected across the country and therefore poses a significant threat to the safety of school children walking to school; is concerned that the Government does not collect figures centrally on this issue; and calls upon the Government to give the necessary support to all authorities responsible for providing this vital service in order to reverse this dangerous trend.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 28 February 2000

    Early Day Motion

    That this House congratulates the Surrey Comet on their succesful lollipop patrol campaign highlighting the fact that there is a chronic shortage of lollipop attendants throughout the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames; notes that this is likely to be reflected across the country and therefore poses a significant threat to the safety of school children walking to school; is concerned that the Government does not collect figures centrally on this issue; and calls upon the Government to give the necessary support to all authorities responsible for providing this vital service in order to reverse this dangerous trend.

    Source: Early Day Motion

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.