Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United Kingdom · Motion · Early Day Motion

EDM 506

CASH MACHINE CHARGES (No. 2)

openUnited Kingdom· UK Parliament· EN

Introduced

9 March 2000

Last action

9 March 2000 · Early Day Motion

Status

0

Sponsors

Sir David Crausby

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

9 March 2000

Summary

That this House congratulates the Government on the threat to take legal action against high street banks unless they disclose charges for cash machine withdrawals; believes that customers should be warned on screen when they are being charged and by how much they are being charged; congratulates those banks and building societies which continue to offer free access to cash machines; and urges the Government to require that the financial institutions increase the sums of money allowed in cash back transactions in supermarkets.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 9 March 2000

    Early Day Motion

    That this House congratulates the Government on the threat to take legal action against high street banks unless they disclose charges for cash machine withdrawals; believes that customers should be warned on screen when they are being charged and by how much they are being charged; congratulates those banks and building societies which continue to offer free access to cash machines; and urges the Government to require that the financial institutions increase the sums of money allowed in cash back transactions in supermarkets.

    Source: Early Day Motion

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.