United Kingdom · Motion · Early Day Motion
EDM 826
BENEFITS AGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
Introduced
8 June 2000
Last action
8 June 2000 · Early Day Motion
Status
0
Sponsors
Lord Cryer
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
8 June 2000
Summary
That this House congratulates the Social Security Select Committee on its report on the operation of the Benefits Agency medical services, which concludes that the system in place is guilty of penalising claimants unfairly and leads to benefits being withheld from genuine cases; further notes the report's conclusion that Sema Group Limited, which runs BAMS, is cutting costs at the expense of service, resulting in undeserving claims going undetected whilst genuine cases are overlooked; is aware that welfare groups estimate many genuinely disabled people could be losing up to ú70 or ú80 per week; is concerned that amongst the major criticisms are that consultations with doctors are rushed through without the proper checks, that some doctors are not performing to adequate standards and that the medical service could be guilty of institutional racism in its treatment of ethnic minorities; and calls on the Benefits Agency urgently to review decisions made by doctors known to be underperforming, and on ministers to renegotiate the contract with BAMS to bring real improvements in service to the public.
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
8 June 2000
Early Day Motion
That this House congratulates the Social Security Select Committee on its report on the operation of the Benefits Agency medical services, which concludes that the system in place is guilty of penalising claimants unfairly and leads to benefits being withheld from genuine cases; further notes the report's conclusion that Sema Group Limited, which runs BAMS, is cutting costs at the expense of service, resulting in undeserving claims going undetected whilst genuine cases are overlooked; is aware that welfare groups estimate many genuinely disabled people could be losing up to ú70 or ú80 per week; is concerned that amongst the major criticisms are that consultations with doctors are rushed through without the proper checks, that some doctors are not performing to adequate standards and that the medical service could be guilty of institutional racism in its treatment of ethnic minorities; and calls on the Benefits Agency urgently to review decisions made by doctors known to be underperforming, and on ministers to renegotiate the contract with BAMS to bring real improvements in service to the public.
Source: Early Day Motion
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- Lord Cryer · Labour · Primary sponsor
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://edm.parliament.uk/early-day-motions/18203
- Open data entity: https://oralquestionsandmotions-api.parliament.uk/EarlyDayMotions/list
- uk · edm-18203 · source updated 8 June 2000