United Kingdom · Question · Written question
HL HL6863
Asylum: France
Introduced
9 March 2016
Last action
15 March 2016 · Answer
Status
Answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Asylum
Source updated
15 March 2016
Summary
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the rationale behind their decision to appeal the judgment in R (on the application of ZAT and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Article 8 ECHR - Dublin Regulation - interface - proportionality)
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
9 March 2016
Written question
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the rationale behind their decision to appeal the judgment in R (on the application of ZAT and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Article 8 ECHR - Dublin Regulation - interface - proportionality)
Source: Lords
15 March 2016
Answer
The Secretary of State for the Home Department’s (SSHD) rationale for appealing the judgment is that the Tribunal erred in law in making its decision. The Tribunal accepted that the issues in dispute in the case should be considered by the Court of Appeal...
Source: Written answer
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- · Home Office · Answering body
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2016-03-09/HL6863
- Open data entity: https://questions-statements-api.parliament.uk/api/writtenquestions/questions/458829
- uk · wq-458829 · source updated 15 March 2016