Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United Kingdom · Question · Written question

UIN 102637

Criminal Proceedings: Artificial Intelligence

answeredUnited Kingdom· UK Parliament· EN

Introduced

2 January 2026

Last action

23 January 2026 · Answer

Status

Answered

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Artificial intelligence

Source updated

23 January 2026

Artificial intelligence

Summary

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 23 December 2025 to Question 100768, whether AI-generated transcripts will have the same evidential status as human-produced transcripts for the purposes of a) appeals and b) judicial re

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 January 2026

    Written question

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 23 December 2025 to Question 100768, whether AI-generated transcripts will have the same evidential status as human-produced transcripts for the purposes of a) appeals and b) judicial re

    Source: Commons

  2. 23 January 2026

    Answer

    HMCTS recognises the significant potential for AI transcription to drive greater efficiency and opportunities for expanding open justice across the courts and tribunals. As such, HMCTS is piloting how automated transcription (using AI) could assist judges...

    Source: Written answer

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.