United Kingdom · Question · Written question
UIN 106392
Medway Valley Line
Introduced
20 October 2020
Last action
28 October 2020 · Answer
Status
Answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
28 October 2020
Summary
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the compliance of the decision by Southeastern to curtail the majority of services on the Medway Valley Line at Paddock Wood instead of Tonbridge with Appendix 4 to Schedule 1, Sc
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
20 October 2020
Written question
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the compliance of the decision by Southeastern to curtail the majority of services on the Medway Valley Line at Paddock Wood instead of Tonbridge with Appendix 4 to Schedule 1, Sc
Source: Commons
28 October 2020
Answer
As part of COVID related timetable changes, to protect performance across the network during the pandemic and ensure key workers can continue to move across the network, some Medway Valley services now turn at Paddock Wood, to avoid interactions with Main...
Source: Written answer
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
- · Department for Transport · Answering body
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2020-10-20/106392
- Open data entity: https://questions-statements-api.parliament.uk/api/writtenquestions/questions/1244900
- uk · wq-1244900 · source updated 28 October 2020