United Kingdom · Question · Written question
UIN 11845
Uber: Civil Proceedings
Original
Introduced
29 January 2024
Last action
6 February 2024 · Answer
Status
Answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
6 February 2024
Summary
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what discussions she has had with representatives of Uber on the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, [2021] UKSC 5.
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
29 January 2024
Written question
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what discussions she has had with representatives of Uber on the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, [2021] UKSC 5.
Source: Commons
6 February 2024
Answer
The Uber Supreme Court judgment was clear that those who qualify as workers under existing employment law are entitled to rights such as the minimum wage, and all gig economy businesses should ensure they are fulfilling their legal responsibilities.The De...
Source: Written answer
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
- · Department for Business and Trade · Answering body
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-01-29/11845
- Open data entity: https://questions-statements-api.parliament.uk/api/writtenquestions/questions/1685461
- uk · wq-1685461 · source updated 6 February 2024