United Kingdom · Question · Written question
UIN 124154
Railway Stations: Access
Introduced
26 March 2026
Last action
22 April 2026 · Answer
Status
Answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
22 April 2026
Summary
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the Access for All programme, what reasons were provided for the lack of progression of the Wivelsfield bid; and whether it will be considered in future rounds.
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
26 March 2026
Written question
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the Access for All programme, what reasons were provided for the lack of progression of the Wivelsfield bid; and whether it will be considered in future rounds.
Source: Commons
22 April 2026
Answer
As set out in the Written Ministerial Statement of 15 January 2026, schemes were prioritised for Access for All funding, considering a range of factors including passenger benefit, geographic spread, the level of scheme development and the availability of...
Source: Written answer
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
- · Department for Transport · Answering body
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-26/124154
- Open data entity: https://questions-statements-api.parliament.uk/api/writtenquestions/questions/1895714
- uk · wq-1895714 · source updated 22 April 2026