Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United Kingdom · Question · Written question

UIN 15290

Ministry of Justice: Artificial Intelligence

answeredUnited Kingdom· UK Parliament· EN

Introduced

2 July 2026

Last action

14 July 2026 · Answer

Status

Answered

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Artificial intelligence

Source updated

14 July 2026

Artificial intelligence

Summary

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what measures are in place to ensure that human oversight is substantive and effective, rather than limited to formal or nominal review.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 July 2026

    Written question

    To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what measures are in place to ensure that human oversight is substantive and effective, rather than limited to formal or nominal review.

    Source: Commons

  2. 14 July 2026

    Answer

    Reforms to the solely auromated decision-making (ADM) rules in the Data (Use and Access) Act make clear that these are decisions without any meaningful human involvement. This is to prevent ‘rubber stamping’ of decisions qualifying as having a ‘human in t...

    Source: Written answer

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.