United Kingdom · Question · Written question
UIN 15957
Railways: Cost Effectiveness
Original
Introduced
27 February 2024
Last action
1 March 2024 · Answer
Status
Answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
1 March 2024
Summary
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, for what reason supporting documents for the draft Rail Reform Bill published on 20 February 2024 do not reference the expected £1.5 billion in recurring annual savings after an initial five year implementation
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
27 February 2024
Written question
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, for what reason supporting documents for the draft Rail Reform Bill published on 20 February 2024 do not reference the expected £1.5 billion in recurring annual savings after an initial five year implementation
Source: Commons
1 March 2024
Answer
The supporting documents for the draft Rail Reform Bill refer only to costs and savings from a new industry structure. Recurring annual savings set out in the Plan for Rail come from a new commercial model, improvement in fares ticketing and retail, a new...
Source: Written answer
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
- · Department for Transport · Answering body
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-02-27/15957
- Open data entity: https://questions-statements-api.parliament.uk/api/writtenquestions/questions/1692007
- uk · wq-1692007 · source updated 1 March 2024