United Kingdom · Question · Written question
UIN 199857
Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership
Original
Introduced
18 September 2023
Last action
19 October 2023 · Answer
Status
Answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
19 October 2023
Summary
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether her Department sought a side letter similar to those agreed with the Governments of Australia and New Zealand to disapply investor–state dispute settlement provisions under the Comprehensive an
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
18 September 2023
Written question
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether her Department sought a side letter similar to those agreed with the Governments of Australia and New Zealand to disapply investor–state dispute settlement provisions under the Comprehensive an
Source: Commons
19 October 2023
Answer
In seeking accession to CPTPP, the UK committed to the existing standards of this agreement, including its provisions on investor protections backed by a modern and transparent investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism. These features balance the...
Source: Written answer
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
- · Department for Business and Trade · Answering body
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-09-18/199857
- Open data entity: https://questions-statements-api.parliament.uk/api/writtenquestions/questions/1661265
- uk · wq-1661265 · source updated 19 October 2023