Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United Kingdom · Question · Written question

UIN 202638

Defence: Procurement

answeredUnited Kingdom· UK Parliament· EN

Introduced

26 June 2014

Last action

14 July 2014 · Answer

Status

Answered

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

14 July 2014

Defence

Summary

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much of the £1.2 billion underspend in his Department's equipment budget in 2012-13 arose as a result of programme slippage; what programmes were behind schedule; and for what reason those programmes were beh

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 26 June 2014

    Written question

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much of the £1.2 billion underspend in his Department's equipment budget in 2012-13 arose as a result of programme slippage; what programmes were behind schedule; and for what reason those programmes were beh

    Source: Commons

  2. 14 July 2014

    Answer

    Our analysis of the £1.2 billion underspend in 2012-13 in our equipment programme shows that it has been caused by a combination of factors, including better than expected outcomes from contract negotiations; budget being allocated for risks that did not...

    Source: Written answer

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.