PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United Kingdom · Question · Written question

UIN 44815

Infected Blood Compensation Scheme

answeredUnited Kingdom· UK Parliament· EN

Introduced

7 April 2025

Last action

22 April 2025 · Answer

Status

Answered

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

22 April 2025

Summary

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of requiring the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme to distinguish between people subjected to deliberate, non-consensual trials and other people.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 7 April 2025

    Written question

    To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of requiring the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme to distinguish between people subjected to deliberate, non-consensual trials and other people.

    Source: Commons

  2. 22 April 2025

    Answer

    The Infected Blood Inquiry Report highlights many ethical failings that happened as part of the Infected Blood Scandal. The impact of these ethical failings on infected people has been recognised in the compensation scheme's core autonomy award. In his su...

    Source: Written answer

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.