United Kingdom · Question · Written question
UIN 69447
Serco
Original
Introduced
6 July 2020
Last action
20 July 2020 · Answer
Status
Answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
20 July 2020
Summary
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to Serco's sharing of 296 email addresses belonging to covid-19 contract tracers, for what reasons Serco was not required to refer itself to the Information Commissioner’s Office for
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
6 July 2020
Written question
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to Serco's sharing of 296 email addresses belonging to covid-19 contract tracers, for what reasons Serco was not required to refer itself to the Information Commissioner’s Office for
Source: Commons
20 July 2020
Answer
We understand Serco did report the data breach to the Information Commissioner’s Office.Serco also alerted the NHS Test and Trace service immediately. The breach was caused by including email addresses of new contact tracing recruits in the carbon copy (c...
Source: Written answer
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
- · Department of Health and Social Care · Answering body
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2020-07-06/69447
- Open data entity: https://questions-statements-api.parliament.uk/api/writtenquestions/questions/1220883
- uk · wq-1220883 · source updated 20 July 2020