United Kingdom · Question · Written question
UIN 83792
Espionage: China
Introduced
21 October 2025
Last action
29 October 2025 · Answer
Status
Answered
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
29 October 2025
Summary
To ask the Solicitor General, whether the Attorney General held discussions with the (a) CPS and (b) Director of Public Prosecutions on the available evidence prior to the decision not to proceed with prosecution in the case on Chinese espionage.
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
21 October 2025
Written question
To ask the Solicitor General, whether the Attorney General held discussions with the (a) CPS and (b) Director of Public Prosecutions on the available evidence prior to the decision not to proceed with prosecution in the case on Chinese espionage.
Source: Commons
29 October 2025
Answer
Decisions to prosecute are, rightly, made independently of Government by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).Consent was given by my predecessor on 3 April 2024. Following that date, no Law Officer intervened in the case at any stage.Where a case can no l...
Source: Written answer
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
- · Attorney General · Answering body
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-10-21/83792
- Open data entity: https://questions-statements-api.parliament.uk/api/writtenquestions/questions/1843307
- uk · wq-1843307 · source updated 29 October 2025