Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United Kingdom · Record · Petition

Petition 760914

Review self-defence laws to allow regulated non-lethal deterrents

rejectedUnited Kingdom· UK Parliament· EN

Introduced

12 February 2026

Last action

12 February 2026 · Petition

Status

11 signatures

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

23 March 2026

Defence

Summary

Conduct a formal review of UK self-defence legislation to assess whether regulated, licensed non-lethal personal deterrents should be permitted for individuals at higher risk of gender-based violence, including women and trans people. Women and gender-diverse people face disproportionate levels of harassment, assault and violence. Current UK law prohibits most effective non-lethal deterrents, leaving many feeling unprotected. A formal review could explore carefully regulated, licensed options while maintaining public safety. Safety policy should reflect lived risk and modern realities.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 February 2026

    Petition

    Conduct a formal review of UK self-defence legislation to assess whether regulated, licensed non-lethal personal deterrents should be permitted for individuals at higher risk of gender-based violence, including women and trans people. Women and gender-diverse people face disproportionate levels of harassment, assault and violence. Current UK law prohibits most effective non-lethal deterrents, leaving many feeling unprotected. A formal review could explore carefully regulated, licensed options while maintaining public safety. Safety policy should reflect lived risk and modern realities.

    Source: Petition

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.