Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United Kingdom · Record · Petition

Petition 761728

Review & consider the role of agentic AI in Defence, Security & Public Services

openUnited Kingdom· UK Parliament· EN

Introduced

19 February 2026

Last action

19 February 2026 · Petition

Status

49 signatures

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Defence, Artificial intelligence

Source updated

11 September 2026

Defence · Artificial intelligence

Summary

There's no dedicated legal framework for agentic AI under UK law. It seems the government prefers adapting existing legislation to creating new AI-specific laws. The pressure to innovate is real but the government must consider if agentic AI is the right system for the job, and its governance role. AI agents are tools and agentic AI is the system that uses those tools to think, decide and act independent of human oversight. The government must address any risks like: data leaks, hallucinations, compliance failures, misleading content, reinforcing systemic inequities and distorting decision-making. While protecting democratic integrity, economic stability, human relationships, and societal well-being. As capabilities grow, so does the need for careful governance, security and oversight, for any use of agentic AI in critical National Infrastructure, Public Services, National Defence and highly regulated environments. The government should review how to address the aforementioned risks and ensure compliance is built in from the start.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 19 February 2026

    Petition

    There's no dedicated legal framework for agentic AI under UK law. It seems the government prefers adapting existing legislation to creating new AI-specific laws. The pressure to innovate is real but the government must consider if agentic AI is the right system for the job, and its governance role. AI agents are tools and agentic AI is the system that uses those tools to think, decide and act independent of human oversight. The government must address any risks like: data leaks, hallucinations, compliance failures, misleading content, reinforcing systemic inequities and distorting decision-making. While protecting democratic integrity, economic stability, human relationships, and societal well-being. As capabilities grow, so does the need for careful governance, security and oversight, for any use of agentic AI in critical National Infrastructure, Public Services, National Defence and highly regulated environments. The government should review how to address the aforementioned risks and ensure compliance is built in from the start.

    Source: Petition

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.