United Kingdom · Report · Written statement
UIN HCWS759
Responding to the Grand Chamber ECtHR judgment in Big Brother Watch & others v UK
Introduced
31 March 2022
Last action
31 March 2022 · Written statement
Status
Commons
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
31 March 2022
Summary
On 25 May 2021 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down its judgment in the case of Big Brother Watch & others v UK (BBW). The case concerned the lawfulness of the historic legal frameworks for bulk interception and targeted acq...
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
31 March 2022
Written statement
On 25 May 2021 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down its judgment in the case of Big Brother Watch & others v UK (BBW). The case concerned the lawfulness of the historic legal frameworks for bulk interception and targeted acq...
Source: Commons
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- · Home Office · Answering body
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2022-03-31/HCWS759
- Open data entity: https://questions-statements-api.parliament.uk/api/writtenstatements/statements/1456083
- uk · ws-1456083 · source updated 31 March 2022