Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Amendment · HAMDT

HAMDT 879 (100th)

An amendment to establish a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation for possession of small "personal use" amounts (to be determined by Justice Department regulation) of marijuana, cocaine, and other controlled substances. Such penalties would be assessed by the Justice Department, which would be required to take into account an individual's income and net assets in determining the amount of the penalty in each case. The amendment gives persons against whom a penalty is proposed the opportunity for an administrative hearing and authorizes the Department to compromise, modify, or remit any penalty with or without conditions. Finally, the amendment permits persons against whom a penalty is ordered to appeal the penalty to a federal court in the same manner that other adminsistrative orders can be appealed and prohibits the Justice Department from initiating a civil penalty proceeding more than five years after an alleged violation.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

—

Last action

—

Status

Amendment Passed in Committee of the Whole by Recorded Vote: 293 - 115 (Record Vote No: 315).

Sponsors

Rep. Edwards, Mickey [R-OK-5]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

25 February 2022

Records

Official amendment HAMDT 879 (100th) from United States at United States Congress. Status: Amendment Passed in Committee of the Whole by Recorded Vote: 293 - 115 (Record Vote No: 315)..

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.