Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HJRES

H.J.Res. 985 (93rd)

Joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to the busing or involuntary assignment of students.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

23 April 1974

Last action

23 April 1974 · Introduced

Status

Referred to House Committee on Judiciary.

Sponsors

Rep. Winn, Larry, Jr. [R-KS-3]

Subjects

Rule of law

Source updated

1 August 2024

Rule of law

Summary

Constitutional Amendment - Provides that nothing in the Constitution of the United States shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order requiring or directing any funds to be used or withheld or encourage, the busing of students from one school to another to force any student or students attending any elementary or secondary school in their own neighborhood, where such school is not established purposely to perpetuate segregation, to attend any other school against his or her choice, the choice of his or her parents, parent or guardian, in order to accomplish desegregation on the basis of race, color, or national origin.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 23 April 1974

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 23 April 1974

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 23 April 1974

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.