PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Bill · HR

H.R. 1001 (119th)

To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.

Original

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

5 February 2025

Last action

14 May 2025 · Introduced

Status

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Sponsors

Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large], Celeste Maloy, Rep. Owens, Burgess [R-UT-4]

Subjects

Environment, Water Resources Development

Source updated

10 July 2026

Environment · Water Resources Development

Summary

This bill directs the Bureau of Reclamation and the Western Area Power Administration, in consultation with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group, to enter into a memorandum of understanding to explore and address the impact that the 2024 record of decision entitled Supplement to the 2016 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Record of Decision has on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. The memorandum of understanding must include a plan to (1) address the effects that the decision may have on the fund's obligations, (2) address the impact that the decision has on hydropower production at Glen Canyon Dam, and (3) identify impacts that the decision has had on species listed as threatened or endangered species. By way of background, Reclamation published a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 for the Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP) in 2024. The SEIS revises the 2016 LTEMP Record of Decision to address two issues: (1) responding to the threat of the invasive smallmouth bass below Glen Canyon Dam, and (2) incorporating the latest sediment science to assess when high-flow experiments should be conducted in order to protect the endangered humpback chub.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 5 February 2025

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 5 February 2025

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 5 February 2025

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 12 February 2025

    Reported

    Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

    Source: Committee

  5. 12 February 2025

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

    Source: Committee

  6. 17 April 2025

    Calendars

    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 38.

    Source: Calendars

  7. 17 April 2025

    Reported

    Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-61.

    Source: Committee

  8. 17 April 2025

    Reported

    Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-61.

    Source: Committee

  9. 13 May 2025

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  10. 13 May 2025

    Passed

    On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1972)

    Source: Floor

  11. 13 May 2025

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1972)

    Source: Floor

  12. 13 May 2025

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1001.

    Source: Floor

  13. 13 May 2025

    Floor

    Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1972-1973)

    Source: Floor

  14. 13 May 2025

    Floor

    Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    Source: Floor

  15. 14 May 2025

    Introduced

    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

5 official files

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.

To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. — United States — PoliticalRepo