Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 1030 (97th)

A bill to repeal sections 3478 and 3479 of the Revised Statutes (31 U.S.C. 204 and 205), which impose a requirement upon persons prosecuting claims, either as attorney or on their own account, to take the oath of allegiance and to support the Constitution of the United States.

openUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

22 January 1981

Last action

19 May 1981 · Committee

Status

Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

Sponsors

Rep. Danielson, George E. [D-CA-30]

Subjects

Rule of law

Source updated

11 May 2023

Rule of law

Summary

Repeals the provisions of Federal law requiring persons prosecuting claims, either as attorneys or on their own account, before any department or agency of the United States, to take the oath of allegiance and to support the Constitution of the United States.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 22 January 1981

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on The Judiciary.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 22 January 1981

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 22 January 1981

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 17 February 1981

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations.

    Source: Committee

  5. 19 May 1981

    Committee

    Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.