PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 10896 (95th)

A bill to amend the Public Health Service Act to repeal the authority for capitation grants to schools of medicine and osteopathy and to increase the authorizations for certain training programs of schools of medicine, and for other purposes.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

9 February 1978

Last action

Status

Referred to House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce.

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

1 August 2024

Summary

Amends the Public Health Service Act to end, after fiscal year 1978, capitation grants to schools of medicine and osteopathy. Increases the authorization of appropriations during fiscal years 1979 and 1980 for grants: (1) for the establishment of departments of family medicine in medical schools; (2) for area health education centers; (3) for training, traineeships, and fellowships in general internal medicine and general pediatrics; (4) for family medicine and general dentistry practice in certain public or nonprofit private entities; (5) for educational assistance to individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds; and (6) meeting the costs of schools of medicine, dentistry, osteopathy and other schools which are in serious financial distress. Authorizes appropriations during fiscal years 1979 and 1980 for the collection of demographic information on health professions personnel. Increases authorizations for appropriations for fiscal years 1979 and 1980 for scholarships for first-year students of exceptional financial need.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.