Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 1291 (114th)

Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety Act of 2015

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

4 March 2015

Last action

5 March 2015 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials.

Sponsors

Rep. Esty, Elizabeth H. [D-CT-5], Rep. Maloney, Sean Patrick [D-NY-18], Rep. Himes, James A. [D-CT-4], Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26], Rep. Pascrell, Bill, Jr. [D-NJ-9]

Subjects

Transport, Taxation, Education

Source updated

3 December 2025

Transport · Taxation · Education

Summary

Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety Act of 2015 This bill authorizes appropriations for FY2016-FY2019 for the highway safety improvement program, with $50 million set aside for each fiscal year for the Railway-Highway Crossings Program. The limitation to three states per year is eliminated, so all states now become eligible for the award of Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety improvement grants to develop or continue enhanced public education and awareness activities, in combination with targeted law enforcement, to reduce traffic law violations at highway-rail grade crossings, as well as to prevent and reduce injuries and fatalities along railroad rights-of-way. The limitation on grant amounts awarded to a state is increased from $250,000 to $2.5 million. Eligibility requirements are revised for the award of capital grants to states under the rail line relocation and improvement program. Increased appropriations under the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 are authorized for FY2016-FY2019 for the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to make grants to the Operation Lifesaver program. The FRA shall hire: 16 full-time grade crossing safety managers to work with state and local officials to identify safety improvements to highway-rail grade crossings; and 8 trespass prevention managers to work with local governments, schools, businesses, and railroads to develop site-specific mitigation plans. The Secretary of Transportation shall study the feasibility of requiring railroad carriers to provide additional means for the public to report problems at highway-rail grade crossings, including via the Internet and text messaging.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 4 March 2015

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 4 March 2015

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 4 March 2015

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 5 March 2015

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 4 March 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 4 March 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 4 March 2015

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.