Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 1473 (115th)

Prohibit Expansion of U.S. Combat Troops into Syria Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

9 March 2017

Last action

9 March 2017 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Sponsors

Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-12], Rep. Jones, Walter B., Jr. [R-NC-3], Rep. Capuano, Michael E. [D-MA-8], Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2], Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2], Rep. Pallone, Frank [D-NJ-6], Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2], Rep. Lewis, John [D-GA-5], Rep. Fudge, Marcia L. [D-OH-11], Rep. Butterfield, G. K. [D-NC-1], Rep. Cleaver, Emanuel [D-MO-5], Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-10], Rep. Bass, Karen [D-CA-37], Rep. Hastings, Alcee L. [D-FL-20], Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4], Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8], Rep. Velázquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7], Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7], Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9], Rep. Nolan, Richard M. [D-MN-8], Rep. Grijalva, Raúl M. [D-AZ-7], Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9], Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT], Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-13], Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17], Rep. Watson Coleman, Bonnie [D-NJ-12], Rep. Rush, Bobby L. [D-IL-1], Rep. DeFazio, Peter A. [D-OR-4], Rep. Ellison, Keith [D-MN-5], Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1], Rep. Eshoo, Anna G. [D-CA-18], Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1], Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D-CA-18], Rep. Barragán, Nanette Diaz [D-CA-44], Rep. Green, Al [D-TX-9]

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

11 August 2025

Defence

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Summary

Prohibit Expansion of U.S. Combat Troops into Syria Act This bill prohibits the obligation or expenditure of Department of Defense funds for the purpose of: deploying members of the Armed Forces to Syria to engage in ground combat operations; awarding a contract to a private security contractor to conduct any activity on the ground of Syria; or otherwise establishing or maintaining any presence of members of the Armed Forces or private security contractors on the ground of Syria, unless the purpose of such presence is limited solely to rescuing or protecting members of the Armed Forces from imminent danger. The prohibition does not apply to the deployment of the Armed Forces to protect, rescue, or remove U.S. personnel.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 9 March 2017

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 9 March 2017

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 9 March 2017

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 9 March 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 9 March 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 9 March 2017

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.