PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 1677 (99th)

A bill to provide a deduction for employment expenses which are incurred by the taxpayer for the care of certain individuals in the home or in a dependent care center if such care is necessary for the gainful employment of the taxpayer or a member of the household of which any such individual is a member.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

21 March 1985

Last action

Status

Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means.

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 February 2024

Summary

Amends the Internal Revenue Code to allow an income tax deduction for employment expenses incurred by the taxpayer for the care of children or handicapped individuals in the home or in a dependent care center if such care is necessary for the gainful employment of the taxpayer or a member of the household of which any such individual is a member. Limits the amount of the deductible home care expenses to $10,000 for one individual requiring care and $15,000 for two or more such individuals. Limits the amount of the deductible dependent care center expenses to $5,000 for one individual and $7,500 for two or more individuals. Sets forth rules relating to the deduction of employment expenses for dependent care in joint-employment agreement and shared-expense agreement situations. Provides that if a taxpayer elects the employment expense deduction for certain amounts, such amounts are not allowable for the dependent care credit or the medical expense deduction.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.