PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 1832 (117th)

GRUB Act

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

11 March 2021

Last action

11 March 2021 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Sponsors

Bill Huizenga, Seth Moulton, Louie Gohmert, Daniel Kildee, Yvette Herrell, Lisa McClain, Barbara Lee, Peter Meijer, Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1], John Moolenaar, Madison Cawthorn, Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14], Jackie Walorski, W. Steube, Sen. Slotkin, Elissa [D-MI], Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-NY-11], Rep. Walberg, Tim [R-MI-5], Lauren Boebert, Derek Kilmer, Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12], Andy Levin, RON KIND, Rep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12], Ted Budd, Brenda Lawrence, Richard Hudson, Jeff Fortenberry, David Rouzer, Bill Posey, Vicky Hartzler, Scott Franklin, Dan Bishop, Jerry Carl, Burgess Owens

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

6 June 2025

Defence

Summary

Guard Reimbursement for Unhealthy Bites Act or the GRUB Act This bill requires the Department of Defense to pay National Guard members a per diem for each day they performed duty between January 26, 2021, and March 15, 2021, in response to the attacks on January 6, 2021, on the U.S. Capitol building and grounds. The per diem rate must be equal to the proportional meal rate determined by the Defense Travel Management Office for the National Capital Region.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 11 March 2021

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 11 March 2021

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 11 March 2021

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.