United States · Bill · HR
H.R. 2062 (117th)
Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act of 2021
Introduced
18 March 2021
Last action
24 June 2021 · Introduced
Status
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Sponsors
Rep. Scott, Robert C. "Bobby" [D-VA-3], Rodney Davis, Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1], Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1], Alma Adams, John Katko, Cynthia Axne, Jenniffer González-Colón, Marie Newman, Jefferson Van Drew, Alan Lowenthal, Rep. Grothman, Glenn [R-WI-6], Susan Wild, Trey Hollingsworth, Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large], Joseph Morelle, Rep. Garcia, Sylvia R. [D-TX-29], Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6], Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9], Jahana Hayes, Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9], Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1], David Cicilline, Michael Turner, DON YOUNG, Rep. Salazar, Maria Elvira [R-FL-27], Rep. Doggett, Lloyd [D-TX-37], Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-10], Frederica Wilson, Bennie Thompson, Mark Takano, Rep. Mfume, Kweisi [D-MD-7], Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17], Rep. Omar, Ilhan [D-MN-5], Mondaire Jones, Kathy Manning, Andy Levin, Donald Norcross, Kaiali'i Kahele, Gregorio Sablan, Rep. Courtney, Joe [D-CT-2], Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7], Mikie Sherrill, Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2], Haley Stevens, Adriano Espaillat, Rep. McBath, Lucy [D-GA-6], Don Bacon
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
5 December 2025
Summary
Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act This bill revises the evidentiary standard for age discrimination by establishing an unlawful employment practice when the complaining party demonstrates that age or participation in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation related to an age discrimination claim was a motivating factor for an adverse practice, even though other factors also motivated the practice (thereby allowing what are commonly known as mixed motive claims). The bill (1) permits the complaining party to rely on any type or form of admissible evidence, which need only be sufficient for a reasonable trier of fact to find that an unlawful practice occurred; and (2) declares that the complaining party shall not be required to demonstrate that age or retaliation was the sole cause of the employment practice (thereby rejecting the Supreme Court's decision in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. , which requires the complainant to prove that age was the but-for cause for the employer's decision). The bill applies this evidentiary standard to other employment discrimination and retaliation claims, including claims under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. In a claim in which age discrimination is shown, but where the employer demonstrates that it would have taken the same action absent the motivating factor of age, the bill authorizes courts to grant declaratory and injunctive relief, but prohibits the court from awarding damages or issuing an order requiring any admission, reinstatement, hiring, promotion, or payment. This limitation also applies to claims of discrimination based on disability.
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
18 March 2021
Introduced
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Source: IntroReferral
18 March 2021
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
18 March 2021
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
26 May 2021
Vote
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 29 - 18.
Source: Committee
26 May 2021
Committee
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Source: Committee
17 June 2021
Calendars
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 44.
Source: Calendars
17 June 2021
Reported
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Labor. H. Rept. 117-63.
Source: Committee
17 June 2021
Reported
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Labor. H. Rept. 117-63.
Source: Committee
22 June 2021
Vote
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 486 Reported to House. The resolution provides for 1 hour of debate, orders the previous question, and allows a motion to recommit for each measure. Provides that H. Res. 485 is adopted. Provides that anytime through the legislative day of June 25, 2021, the Speaker may entertain motions offered by the Majority Leader or his designee that the House suspend the rules with respect to multiple measures that were the object of motions to suspend the rules on the legislative days of June 22 or 23, and on which the yeas and nays were ordered and further proceedings postponed.
Source: Floor
23 June 2021
Passed
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Source: Floor
23 June 2021
Vote
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 247 - 178 (Roll no. 180).
Source: Floor
23 June 2021
Vote
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 247 - 178 (Roll no. 180).
Source: Floor
23 June 2021
Floor
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Source: Floor
23 June 2021
Vote
The resolution provides for 1 hour of debate, orders the previous question, and allows a motion to recommit for each measure. Provides that H. Res. 485 is adopted. Provides that anytime through the legislative day of June 25, 2021, the Speaker may entertain motions offered by the Majority Leader or his designee that the House suspend the rules with respect to multiple measures that were the object of motions to suspend the rules on the legislative days of June 22 or 23, and on which the yeas and nays were ordered and further proceedings postponed.
Source: Floor
23 June 2021
Floor
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 486. (consideration: CR H3052-3067; text: CR H3052-3053)
Source: Floor
24 June 2021
Introduced
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Source: IntroReferral
Votes
23 June 2021 · passed · On Passage · Passed · Official source
Yes 247 · No 178 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 5
- A. FergusonNay
- A. McEachinYea
- Abigail SpanbergerYea
- Adam KinzingerYea
- Sen. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA]Yea
- Rep. Smith, Adam [D-WA-9]Yea
- Adrian SmithNay
- Adriano EspaillatYea
Showing the first 8 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.
Versions
- Referred in Senate · 24 June 2021 · Official file
- Engrossed in House · 23 June 2021 · Official file
- Reported in House · 17 June 2021 · Official file
- Introduced in House · 18 March 2021 · Official file
Documents
11 official files
Referred in Senate (text)
Referred in Senate (text)
Referred in Senate · EN · 24 June 2021
Referred in Senate (PDF)
Referred in Senate · EN · 24 June 2021
Engrossed in House (text)
Engrossed in House · EN · 23 June 2021
Engrossed in House (PDF)
Engrossed in House · EN · 23 June 2021
Passed House
summary · EN · 23 June 2021
Reported in House (text)
Reported in House · EN · 17 June 2021
Reported in House (PDF)
Reported in House · EN · 17 June 2021
Reported to House
summary · EN · 17 June 2021
Introduced in House (text)
Introduced in House · EN · 18 March 2021
Introduced in House (PDF)
Introduced in House · EN · 18 March 2021
Introduced in House
summary · EN · 18 March 2021
Sponsors
- Rep. Scott, Robert C. "Bobby" [D-VA-3] · D · Sponsor
- Rodney Davis · R · Sponsor
- Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1] · D · Sponsor
- Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1] · R · Sponsor
- Alma Adams · D · Sponsor
- John Katko · R · Sponsor
- Cynthia Axne · D · Sponsor
- Jenniffer González-Colón · R · Sponsor
- Marie Newman · D · Sponsor
- Jefferson Van Drew · R · Sponsor
- Alan Lowenthal · D · Sponsor
- Rep. Grothman, Glenn [R-WI-6] · R · Sponsor
- Susan Wild · D · Sponsor
- Trey Hollingsworth · R · Sponsor
- Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large] · D · Cosponsor
- Joseph Morelle · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Garcia, Sylvia R. [D-TX-29] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9] · D · Cosponsor
- Jahana Hayes · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1] · D · Cosponsor
- David Cicilline · D · Cosponsor
- Michael Turner · R · Cosponsor
- DON YOUNG · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Salazar, Maria Elvira [R-FL-27] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Doggett, Lloyd [D-TX-37] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-10] · D · Cosponsor
- Frederica Wilson · D · Cosponsor
- Bennie Thompson · D · Cosponsor
- Mark Takano · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Mfume, Kweisi [D-MD-7] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Omar, Ilhan [D-MN-5] · D · Cosponsor
- Mondaire Jones · D · Cosponsor
- Kathy Manning · D · Cosponsor
- Andy Levin · D · Cosponsor
- Donald Norcross · D · Cosponsor
- Kaiali'i Kahele · D · Cosponsor
- Gregorio Sablan · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Courtney, Joe [D-CT-2] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7] · D · Cosponsor
- Mikie Sherrill · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2] · D · Cosponsor
- Haley Stevens · D · Cosponsor
- Adriano Espaillat · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. McBath, Lucy [D-GA-6] · D · Cosponsor
- Don Bacon · R · Cosponsor
Showing 48 of 115 sponsors and actors.
Related records
- related to → Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act
- related to ← Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2062) to amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 and other laws to clarify appropriate standards for Federal employment discrimination and retaliation claims, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 239) to amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for limitations on copayments for contraception furnished by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1443) to amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to require the collection of small business loan data related to LGBTQ- owned businesses; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 13) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating to "Update of Commission's Conciliation Procedures"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 14) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 15) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of Currency relating to "National Banks and Federal Savings Associations as Lenders"; and for other purposes.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2062
- Open data entity: https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/117/hr/2062
- us · 117-hr-2062 · source updated 5 December 2025