Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 2110 (114th)

Consumer Review Freedom Act of 2015

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

29 April 2015

Last action

1 May 2015 · Referred

Status

Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.

Sponsors

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48], Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-15], Rep. Sherman, Brad [D-CA-32], Rep. Farenthold, Blake [R-TX-27], Rep. Eshoo, Anna G. [D-CA-18], Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9], Rep. Honda, Michael M. [D-CA-15], Rep. Polis, Jared [D-CO-2], Rep. Peters, Scott H. [D-CA-50]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

12 August 2025

Summary

Consumer Review Freedom Act of 2015 Declares a provision of a form contract to be void from the inception if it: (1) prohibits or restricts a person who is a party to the contract from engaging in written, verbal, or pictorial reviews, or other similar performance assessments or analyses of, the products, services, or conduct of a business that is a party to the contract; (2) imposes penalties or fees against persons who engage in such communications; or (3) transfers or requires the individual to transfer any intellectual property rights in any such otherwise lawful communications about the person or the goods or services provided by the person or business. (Thus, bars certain contract provisions that prohibit consumers from commenting publicly about businesses.) Sets forth exceptions under which a provision shall not be considered void under this Act if the provision prohibits disclosure of certain: (1) trade secrets or commercial or financial information, (2) personnel and medical files, or (3) law enforcement records. Provides for this Act to be inapplicable to contracts establishing an employer-employee or independent contractor relationship. Prohibits businesses from offering or entering into form contracts containing a provision that is considered void under this Act. Sets forth authority for the Department of Justice (DOJ) and state attorneys general to enforce such prohibition. Requires DOJ to bring an action against any business that violates such prohibition for civil penalty of not more than $16,000 for each day that the business requires the use of such a form contract by a distinct person.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 29 April 2015

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 29 April 2015

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 29 April 2015

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 1 May 2015

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Introduced in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN · 29 April 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in House (PDF)

    Introduced in House · EN · 29 April 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 29 April 2015

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.